Editorial

by Thomas Gilly

 

 

The papers that are collected in this issue focus on the ethical relevance of crime and criminal justice issues.

Two of the papers we have collected are substantially concerned with the relevance of ethics and deontology to crime prevention and other important issues of policing. They are altogether inherent parts of a series of articles that started with David Patterson’s paper “Consequences of Profiling for Crime/Terrorism: Ethical Dilemmas”. It is published in the first issue of the second Volume of our journal.

This issue is also central to a power-point presentation that we have decided to publish on the ERCES web-site http://www.erces.com. To find it click simply on the link “Crime News and Events”

The three other papers, instead of focussing on the practical dimension of ethics and the impact of ethics upon the police and policing, provide a theoretical or even a philosophical perspective to the debate on ethics and crime and justice issues.

Since both perspectives are complementary parts of the same debate, it was not easy to choose the one to be placed in front; together both perspectives hold for the dialectics between theory and practice that precludes any sorts of primacy. The circumstance that this issue starts with the theoretical part of the ethical debate that it is involved in issues of crime and criminal justice is basically the tributary of a didactical postulate: To explain crime, criminologists must first of all, have a more or less clear idea about the nature of the subject that they are committed to explain; there is a requirement for a general agreement about the concept of crime. Otherwise criminologists are likely to explain deviance, not crime. It is as it is in the schools and universities: The teacher’s lesson on the impact of the pollution upon the climate, the lesson on ecological disasters, presupposes that the schoolgirls and boys possess a basic geographical knowledge  

“ Ethics of crime – what does this mean?”  Obviously the question points at the relevance of ethics for the concept of crime and its various meanings. Since the notion of “concept” refers to “conceptualization”, the question that introduces “From the ancient greek “crime”(krima) as a intellectual error to the Christian “crime” (crimen) as a moral sin”, by Michael Bakaoukas is a clear announcement of the paper’s major concern. The paper is substantially concerned with the historical process that consists in the development and elaboration of the concept of “crime”. Michael Bakaoukas provides for a study in depth of the shift that has affected, in a substantial manner, the meaning of crime. The transformation is the process that supplants the inherent political, sociological and finally the rational connotation of the ancient Greek (and Latin) concept by that of the moral connotation as it is typical for the Christian (Greek and Latin) tradition.

Regardless of the paper’s historical and social and legal philosophical interest, Michael Bakaoukas’ study, undoubtedly, is a major contribution to the history and the actual debate about the ethics of crime. He shift of ethics focal center from a social-political rationale to moral essentialism is indeed an issue that is extremely relevant to ethics.

“A theoretical criminology approach to criminal acts and deviant behaviour in the International Space Station” by Julian Hermida is the second theoretical paper that we have collected.

Julian Hermida’s guideline hypothesis is that the unique characteristics of the space environment, together with the exceptional social factors of all involved actors, demand new and specific theories to explain criminal behavior in outer space. Since crime and deviance, in such an environment, can be reasonably expected to have a substantial criminological implication, the major’s  major aim is to see, by means of an I depth study of the most important theories, which of one, if any, may be applied to criminal and deviant behavior in outer space.

Obviously Hermida’s paper is foremost relevant to theoretical criminology; insofar it provides for an important contribution regarding the construction of theory in the field of criminology and deviance theory. And yet, the paper, by focusing on multi-culturally diverse space experiences and environmental diversity, points at an issue that is central to ethics: habit and spatial life environment. The papers relevance for ethics consists of the demonstration of actuality of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethic (Book II 1-3) and its relevance to the construction and development of criminological theory.

 

In “What can criminologists learn from Fritz Lang?”, I explore the the relevance of Fritz Lang’s movie “M” to fundamental issues in criminology, deviance theory and criminal justice. In this paper I discuss the rationale and the fundamentals of (criminal) justice. Justice as a case for ethics is one of the paper’s major concern.

 

Police ethics in France: A twenty one years overview”, by Jean-Claude Salomon, provides for an in dept study of the history and the actual state of police ethics in France. It addresses the social and political circumstances and conditions of the introduction, further development

 and the practical impact of the French police code. Considering the code’s application to every daily-life police work, the paper points at the discrepancy between theory and practice.

The paper demonstrates a major concern for the dynamics of police ethics. The shift from ethics to security is one of the most important aspects of such dynamics.

Obviously the paper’s relevance for ethics consists of ( i) the confrontation of a deontological police code with daily life police ethics; (ii) the question whether and to which degree a police deontology is or is not desirable from the ethical/legal and practical viewpoint.

The study is based on the experience of the author’s membership in police union.

We conclude this issue with “Comparative European and American Drug Control Policy: An Examination of Efficacy and Contributing Factors”,  by William P. Bloss.

The observation that is central to this paper is as follows:

Much of the global demand-side drug control policy has been influenced by an American-led prohibitionist ideology. However, some European states have advocated a public health "harm reduction" approach that embraces prevention, education, and treatment as a means of reducing drug user demand. .

This paper examines the divergent approaches among crime control and public health ideologies in terms of their efficacy in reducing drug user demand. Using US and European official data measures of population drug use and legislated policies as indicators of policy intent and efficacy, the study analyzes the ideological direction and effectiveness of drug demand control policies and their practical effect on police and other government organizations to implement such policies. As noted by Krzysztof (2004) and others, European drug demand control policy is not as unified as the American prohibitionist approach, and therefore, numerous models have emerged. The findings of the paper not only support this contention of policy diversity but further conclude that socio-political factors may exert greater ideological influence on European state drug policies than American prohibitionist perspectives. And, the findings show efforts to measure realistic demand reduction often produce inconclusive results regarding the merits of competing policies.

 

Regardless of the paper’s high relevance to comparative research on drug demand control ideology, the author provides an in depth study to the actual debate about realistic and efficacious drug demand control strategies.

Since the paper’s major concern is (i) to critically compare and to evaluate the ideological factor which is involved in the US American prohibitionist approach and in the European approach, (ii) to provide for findings that are praxis-relevant, it is obvious that it is a major contribution to the ethics of public health and drug demand control strategies.

 

Our editorial concludes with two advertisements:

 

The first one concerns the power-point I’ve already mentioned at the beginning of my editorial

Sensitive aspects of the development of criminal registration systems”, by Andris Kairiôs provides for an in depth study of the sensitive aspects and inherent ethical problems of criminal registration systems. The study is based on the experience of the Ministry of the Republic of Latvia. It addresses both the need for criminal registration systems and for sensitive data collection and the negative or even tragic consequences that might occur through lack of careful control and collection achievement.

By pointing at (i) the ethically legitimated collection of sensitive data; (ii) the inherent ethical problems in sensitive data collection and (iii) the need for risk-management, Andris Kairiôs power-point clearly demonstrates its relevance for applied ethics.

 

The second advertisement concerns the announcement of the 2nd International ERCES Conference that will be scheduled In April 2005.

The ERCES web-site will shortly provide for all information, regarding registration, location, call for papers etc.    

 

On Tuesday, 4th October 2005, the Jews of the world will celebrate Roch Hachana.

 

We wish you all  a happy and a peaceful new 5766 – Shanah Tovah!